Showing 20640 results

A letter from Aodh de Blacam to Fr. Senan Moynihan OFM Cap. referring to the contents of the 1948 edition of ‘The Capuchin Annual’.

A letter from Aodh de Blacam to Fr. Senan Moynihan OFM Cap. congratulating him on the second issue of ‘Bonaventure’ which he promises to review favourably.

A letter from Aodh de Blacam, Warrenpoint, County Down, to Fr. Senan Moynihan OFM Cap. congratulating the friar on the latest edition of ‘The Capuchin Annual’ which he describes as ‘amazing’. He also refers to his recent poor health and apologizing for not being able to write an article about the pilgrimage to Knock.

A letter from Aodh de Blacam, Warrenpoint, County Down, to Fr. Senan Moynihan OFM Cap. conveying his reflections on ‘The Capuchin Annual’ (1942) which he describes as ‘a prodigy’.

Letter from Aodh de Blacam to Fr. Senan Moynihan OFM Cap. affirming that a proof copy of his article is adequate particularly as paper is scare.

A letter from Aodh de Blacam to Douglas Hyde (‘An Craoibhín Aoibhinn’) thanking him for the copy of ‘Dánta Dé’ and commending its contents.

Letter from Aodh de Blacam to Fr. Senan Moynihan OFM Cap. referring to proofs of his forthcoming article on his recent visit to Rome. He also refers to his 'rosaries' from Fr. Henry Edward George Rope. De Blacam concludes 'My patient is marvellously better. I myself lost 1 stone since New Year, not missing it'.

A letter from Alfred Sinnott, Archbishop of Winnipeg, Canada, to Peter Kilroy, ‘The Standard’, Dublin, referring to the Canon Patrick Sheehan articles in ‘The Capuchin Annual’ (1952).

Letter from Archbishop Anselm Edward John Kenealy OFM Cap., Franciscan Friary, Crawley, Essex, to Fr. Senan Moynihan OFM Cap. thanking him for the copy of ‘The Capuchin Annual’ and recalling his own literary work while Archbishop of Simla in India.

A letter from Archbishop Bernard Mary Williams, Stroud, Gloucestershire, to Fr. Senan Moynihan OFM Cap. conveying his impressions of the ‘Orange Terror’ offprint published by the ‘The Capuchin Annual’ office. Williams writes ‘I do not think the book will interest many people here simply because ordinary people are just not interested in the subject with which it deals’.